Male sexuality

Post Comment

Rachel Rabbit White started The Man Project to hear about the aspects of male sexuality that don't get discussed. Human male sexuality encompasses a wide variety of feelings and behaviors. Men's feelings of attraction may be caused by various physical and social traits of their potential partner. Sexual health refers to a state of well-being that lets a man fully participate in and Men with troubling sexual dysfunction and fatigue may want to ask their.

Editor's Note: The following piece is adapted from Esther Perel's Networker Symposium keynote, "Our Myths About Sexuality." To read more from the. Read about the phases of male sexuality, the role of testosterone in a man's sex drive, and some of the stereotypes surrounding the male sex. For many men orgasm without ejaculation enables a man to be multi-orgasmic, to maintain consistent sexual energy, desire, and confidence.

Long-held stereotypes contend that men are always interested in sex, happiest being the pursuer and focused solely on the physical. A new. Baumeister cites a survey of several hundred clergy in which 62% of priests admitted to sexual activity, compared to 49% of nuns. The men. Editor's Note: The following piece is adapted from Esther Perel's Networker Symposium keynote, "Our Myths About Sexuality." To read more from the.






Esther Perel. For most of history, men have leveraged their social power and status sexuality sexual favors. And women have used their beauty, their youth, and their sexuality to access social power sexuality would otherwise be denied to them.

The MeToo movement is about more than harassment. Women have had about 50 years in this country to rethink their place in the world, to male, to expand the definitions of female identity.

This is toxic masculinity: the norm itself. So we have to continue sexuality invest in helping women find their voice and find their power. And at male same time, we have to help men be able to safely open their sexuality and show their vulnerability.

Emotions are human, and we need to free them from the gender-specific reductionism of labeling tenderness and softness as feminine and power and robustness as masculine. But sexuality insecurity is old news.

This skewed sense of masculinity is societal. Men internalize it, boys internalize it, and the people who raise them internalize it.

And that leads me to think about male sexuality. Male you know that 97 percent of all research on low sexual sexuality is done on women? What does that mean? Male sexuality is defined as biological and female sexuality is defined as psychological. But men bring major vulnerabilities to sexuality that have led me to understand male male sexuality is in fact highly relational, male at all simplistic and just biological.

Consider the fear of rejection. Is that not a relational experience? What about the fear of inadequacy and performance anxiety? Next myth: male sexuality is predatory. I wanted to say that is so not the case. And there—in his concern for her experience—lies the line between sex and violence. This too is male relational. Paid sex or porn are often sought out for precisely this reason.

Male what turns her on is to sexuality the turn-on. Male male-sexuality myth: all he wants is sexuality. What comes across as his singular determination for sex is often hiding his true needs: sex is the only socially acceptable way to experience those feelings. If we want this to shift, we need to create a culture where men male express their needs in more than just the masculine code of sex.

As therapists, we have a unique role at this moment to help everyone navigate the challenges of modern relationship. Our relationships are undergoing massive changes, and we can help people engage in courageous conversations and speak the unspoken. For many of us therapists, this may be the first time we ourselves are having these conversations.

Click here for more details. Want to read more articles like this? Subscribe sexuality Psychotherapy Networker Today! Your email address will not be published. Website URL. I would gently challenge the idea that men are not aggressive. Your browser must support JavaScript to view this content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings then try again.

Events calendar powered by Trumba. You have no items in your shopping cart.

Ever wonder why there are female prostitutes for every male? And that male is only available to other men? If you want learned, peer-reviewed articles, go to the psychology department reading room at your local university. Yes, myth 1 doesn't make sense. If women are more monogamous than men, just who are the men having their non-monogomous sex with??? Rather it would happen if I have a another orgasm after a short time, and there is nothing new to ejaculate. I think of it as a dry orgasm.

Not sure what is meant by "magnetically attracting interested partners". I think women are attracted to men who pay attention to their arousal, not so much how a man can maintain his own arousal. Just like I can enjoy chocolate cake without an erection.

But let's not kid ourselves, I would never consider it a substitute for an erection and an orgasm. I agree with much of this article. But the idea that women have a sex drive equal to men's is just false. That's why it's universal that women can sell sex to men, but men cannot sell sex to women. Men can sell sex to other men, but male-to-female prostitution is virtually non-existent. Selling and buying sex without any context is a very typical man's view of it.

If you let a woman define sex drive, you might come up with a very different answer. You might say that men's more frequent viewing of porn is a strong indication of men's higher sex drive. So then what do you say to a woman who would claim that the fact that far more women than men buy romance novels is a strong indication that women have a higher sex drives than men?

Certainly it sounds idiotic to claim that women buy more romance novels because men have higher sex drives!! Most of those sales were to women and girls. That's pretty explicit erotic literature, with BDSM and all. And let me guess, women bought those books in huge numbers because, uh, men have higher sex drives??? So when you get to choose the yardstick you prefer, of course you're going to show a stronger preference for what you prefer.

Talk about circular argument and thinking inside the box. You seem to think I'm a man. I'm not. I'm a woman who has always had a very high sex drive. So, when I say this, I'm not referring to myself. I'm referring to the average man and average woman. Of course there are men with lower sex drives than some women, and women with lower sex drives that some men. You're correct that sex drive is somewhat difficult to measure, because it is the URGE to engage in sex.

Having an urge does not always translate to behaviour, even if the urge is strong. We can't measure urges directly, so we have to measure them through behaviour, which is positively correlated, but not perfectly so. The best we can do in measuring sex drive is frequency of masturbation, because masturbation doesn't depend on finding a willing partner.

Men masturbate far more frequently than women. Another way of measuring sex drive is by looking at who initiates partnered sex. Men initiate more frequently. Also, my original statement is still valid. Men will pay for sex, either with straight-up money, or with more indirect goodies often within a relationship, such as marriage , but women will almost never pay for sex.

I'm not sure what to make of your example of the romance novels. As I mentioned, I'm a woman, but I don't read them so I don't have a lot of expertise on that. My understanding is that romance novels focus on the developing love relationship between the characters. Some romances are explicitly sexual, and some are not, but all are centered around the relationship. I don't see how this speaks to women's sex drive, but I'm open to being corrected since I don't know that much about it. The problem with these measures of sex drive is that they objectively measure only the measurement, and it is only assumed that they are true indirect measures of something we hazily think of as "sex drive", which itself has no accurate scientific definition.

For example, if you applied these kinds of measures to "drive to eat" my dog would measure a much higher "drive to eat" than I would because if you put a steak in front of him, he uncontrollably leaps forward and gobbles as much as he can, instantly, always. I would not. And so does my dog really have a bigger drive to eat than I do? Not necessarily, because I know food is coming, so I might ignore a steak that was put in front of me when it's not a meal time. So I need a context for eating my steak.

My dog doesn't. In this case, I think the simple measure leaves a lot to be desired. And masturbation has the same shortcoming. Some women never masturbate, but they still have a strong sex drive with their man -- so wouldn't that completely contradict your statement? Certainly in that particular case, the urge to masturbate is certainly far from being a "best" measure of her urge. Not saying you're totally wrong, but urge to masturbate is also more of a measure to have sex without a certain context which more women insist on than men.

So what are you really measuring here -- the need for context, or the sex drive? Or a little of both? How much of each As for prostitution, that's kind of like the masturbation thing, where to some degree it shows that men are more interested in sex outside of a richer context. The problem with that argument is, if you take a woman who is very horny and ready for sex, but has no partner available at the moment, she will, on average, be less inclined to jump in the sack with an anonymous gigolo who is offering the service for free than a man in the same situation faced with a female escort who is offering her services for free.

But is that really a measure of sex drive??? I think a lot of women would say NO! And consider the fact that I would never even consider picking up a female prostitute on the street, no matter how attractive she was, and even if she was free. But does that mean I have a low sex drive?

I can assure you in the most emphatic way possible that I have a high sex drive. I suspect a lot of women share my view on that. But the fact that a lot of men probably wouldn't be as reluctant about the prostitute as I would be Which is my point about how these measures leave a lot to be desired. By the way, the research paper another poster linked here is a review of many other studies, and it points out that the prostitute argument is dubious for many reasons, even though it is commonly used as a sure-fire proof in casual discussions.

Dude, you're just re-iterating what I said about the difficulties of measuring motivational states. Yes, all measure are indirect and imperfect. I stated that. Thus, we have to gather evidence in several different ways. I listed 3 indicators that men have higher sex drives than women. You have not listed any evidence that women and men's sex drives are equal.

It's not accurate to state that "sex drive" has no scientific definition. Motivations and drives are studied by psychological scientists. There are plenty of challenges to studying motivation, so scientists have to be creative in doing so, and realize that no single measure or single study is definition. The weight of evidence from multiple sources has to be considered. That is one way. Another way is by financially supporting a long-term mistress. Or a wife. What I said was that the measurements listed tend to emphasize sex drive without context.

My only objection is that it seems somewhat misdirected if the goal is to understand sex drive within a context of a relationship. In fact, because of this emphasis on how a men are more highly motivated to masturbate, have sex with prostitutes, think about sex when the wife is not around, etc.

And if you then applied that to get insight into sex drives within a relationship, one might reasonably that men don't need sex as much in a relationship, because, unlike women, perhaps men could be more easily satisfied with masturbation than a woman could in the same situation.

On average, women appear to be sexual in the context of a relationship, and I don't see that effect addressed by any of the measures. As for supporting a long-term mistress, that's a shaky argument too because traditionally, that's in a scenario of where only men earn the money.

So what else would you expect? And then there's the all-too-common scenario of where the woman earns the money and is no longer sexually turned on by her non-working husband because she's stressed out and doesn't see the man in the traditional "provider role".

Again pointing out that women's sex drives are more context dependent. Some would argue that many women are turned on only when a man is a provider, which sort of screws up the simple measurement. If the goal is simply to say that in the absence of a relationship context, men are more likely to go out and have just pure sex and pay for it, well, duh, then asking about prostitutes is indeed a direct measure because that's exactly the question you're asking.

But if the goal is to understand what is happening within a marriage or relationship, I'm not sure it provides a lot of insight, or if it's even relevant. I don't think that is a controversial statement and it seems pretty clear. Also, I'm not sure the statement really applies to all ages. Likewise, many books have pointed out that by middle age, the sexes "meet" in terms of desire for sex, and so forth.

So when I hear that a study shows that at all ages, men have a higher level of sex drive, I think it's reasonable to question it, just like I've questioned other studies which appear to flatly contradict this statement for some age groups, and which measures sex drive mostly outside the context of a relationship -- the very kind of difference that matters a lot to women.

As for "no scientific definition" I'll have to admit to my bias, coming from the hard sciences of mathematics, physics, and engineering. We're talking about a "soft science", which many in the hard sciences don't really think of as a real science, and certainly not one free of subjective definitions, which in my opinion this is one.

If you've already made up your mind that psychology isn't a science, then we all get to believe whatever we want. There's no point in discussing research evidence. If you want to make up your own definitions, there's no way we can have a meaningful conversation about anything.

I'm using the accepted definition for "drive," which is an urge, impulse, or desire. I have not seen any evidence that women desire sex more in relationships than men. This supports my claim that, both within and outside committed relationships, men have a higher drive for sex. You need to read what I wrote with some better comprehension, please.

I did not say that psychology is not a science. I said in explanation that I'm biased, meaning I even know that it is a science, but that I do recognize the fact that it is not a hard science.

Likewise, you surely recognize that psychology is difficult as a science because it is not as "exact" in many ways. But that doesn't make the effort useless. But it does open it to more discussion and disagreement about the methods, which is exactly what I'm participating in here.

Yes, I've read that too. But in support of the view opposing mine, a therapist posting here pointed out that those numbers may be biased because women more commonly want to go to therapy to solve this kind of problem. Sex drive is "drive for sex".

You conflate it with the desire to have a relationship, or as you put it "context dependence". But that exact same "context dependence" is the thing that separates male from female sex drive.

But, if none of that does it for you, look at the sexual statistics of gay vs lesbian relationships. Gay men are, as a group, FAR more promiscuous than straight men, and laughably more promiscuous than lesbian women. In fact, the gay "glory hole" is best contrasted with "lesbian bed death".

When two dudes get together there's no "brakes" on the sexual relationship. When two women get together, both have the brakes on, and often that leads to a sexless or near sexless relationship. As another illustration of the difficulty in measuring a woman's sex drive, and how it is context-dependent, and difficult for even women themselves to self-report and understand, look at the history of the vibrator.

The treatment of female hysteria was pelvic massage as recommended and practiced by health experts during the Victorian era. It resulted in "hysterical paroxysm", now known as orgasm.

At the time, even physicians did not believe it was orgasm. But it felt good, and by the 19th century women returned for continued treatment to such an extent that it provided a financial godsend for many doctors.

When the electrical vibrator became available in the late 19th century, it was considered a huge improvement because it allowed doctors to provide more reliable and efficient physical therapy to women believed to be suffering from hysteria. So don't tell me that women didn't pay for sex. In fact, the practice was widespread. But note that it is in a context where it seemed very acceptable. So it would appear to demonstrate that context matters a lot to women.

You don't see how romance novels speak to women's sex drives? The word on the street is that many husbands have seen a major change in the bedroom after their wives read Fifty Shades of Grey. Some of these nerves speed up your heart rate and blood flow to your genitals.

They also signal the process that creates an erection. The limbic system includes multiple parts of the brain: the hippocampus , hypothalamus and amygdala , and others. These parts are involved with emotion, motivation, and sex drive. Researchers at Emory University found that viewing sexually arousing images increased activity in the amygdalae of men more than it did for women.

However, there are many parts of the brain involved with sexual response, so this finding does not necessarily mean that men are more easily aroused than women. Testosterone is the hormone most closely associated with male sex drive. Produced mainly in the testicles, testosterone has a crucial role in a number of body functions, including:. Low levels of testosterone are often tied to a low libido.

Testosterone levels tend to be higher in the morning and lower at night. Sex drive can decrease with age. But sometimes a loss of libido is tied to an underlying condition. The following can cause a decrease in sex drive:. Stress or depression. If you are experiencing mental health issues, talk to your doctor. He or she may prescribe medication or suggest psychotherapy. Low testosterone levels. Certain medical conditions, like sleep apnea , can cause low testosterone levels, which can impact your sex drive.

Certain medications. Some medications can impact your libido. For instance, some antidepressants , antihistamines, and even blood pressure medications can impair erections. Your doctor may be able to suggest an alternative. High blood pressure.

Only you can measure what is normal for your sex drive. If you are experiencing libido changes, talk to your doctor.

Sometimes it can be difficult to talk to someone about your sexual desires, but a medical professional may be able to help you. Does the male sex drive ever go away? For many men, the libido will never completely disappear. For most men, libido will certainly change over time. The way you make love and enjoy sex will likely change over time as well, as will the frequency.

But sex and intimacy can be a pleasurable part of aging. And yet does anyone doubt that there should be concerns about how easy access to porn impacts upon boys' sexual development, their self-esteem, their body image or performance anxieties? It's not as if young men bask in perfect mental health and happiness — young men commit suicide at nearly four times the rate of young women, and sex and relationships rank high on their list of concerns.

At the other end of the age range, sexually active older women are now widely eroticised albeit often with a rather misogynistic undertone as "cougars" or forgive me "Milfs" while their male equivalents are disparaged as dirty old men.

Observer columnist Viv Groskop recently went further, opining about any older man who has sex outside marriage, even the mild-mannered old janitor John Major, saying "Unfortunately it's not against the law to be an old lecher. Maybe it should be. Or at the very least you shouldn't be rewarded with the highest office in the land.

Perhaps the greatest concern for men and women alike should be the way male sexuality and sexual expressiveness balances on a narrow tightrope of acceptability. One step off the wire and you tumble into the realm of perversion. As feminist blogger Clarisse Thorn noted last year, any man who hits on a woman and gets it wrong risks being branded a "creep" — sometimes deservedly so, of course, but often for no greater sin than being insufficiently attractive or socially skilled, or having misread a perceived signal of invitation.

I've never heard of a woman being stigmatised or disparaged for expressing an attraction to big men, rough men, geeky men or whatever. A man who expresses similar desires for women who don't conform to standard norms of beauty is a perv, a fetishist, a weirdo. All of these prejudices are rehearsed and reiterated by men and women alike, they reside in the intangible web of social norms, conventions and culture, but they can and must be challenged and changed.

If we can begin to openly and joyously celebrate the positives to male sexuality, it might become easier for men to be happy and confident sexual partners, and in turn become better lovers, and sometimes better people. Male sexuality is no less diverse, complex and wonderful than women's or, for that matter, no more base, coarse and animalistic.